Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

AUSTIN LAKES, INC. v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 2:14-cv-322. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20141015b94 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge. On September 10, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Abel issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") denying Plaintiff's motion to remand in this action to quiet title. ECF No. 27. The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Id. at 15. The R&R further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen day
More

ORDER

MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.

On September 10, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Abel issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") denying Plaintiff's motion to remand in this action to quiet title. ECF No. 27.

The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Id. at 15. The R&R further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.

Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED and Plaintiff's motion to remand, ECF No 13, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer