EDWARDS v. DAYTON VETERANS MEDICAL CENTER, 3:14-cv-374. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150429g33
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #17), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's M
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #17), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Mo..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #17), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. #15) is DENIED. The Court also certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that the appeal, already taken and assigned #15-3402, is objectively frivolous.
Source: Leagle
