BENNINGTON v. OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, 1:14cv688. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150522b45
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 21, 2015
Latest Update: May 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on April 27, 2015 (Doc. 14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired May 14, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. 6 and
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on April 27, 2015 (Doc. 14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired May 14, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. 6 and 9..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on April 27, 2015 (Doc. 14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired May 14, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. 6 and 9) are GRANTED. This case is here by DISMISSED from the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
