FROMMEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:14cv522. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150706675
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on June 10, 2015 (Doc. 10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired June 29, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner to deny P
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on June 10, 2015 (Doc. 10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired June 29, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner to deny Pl..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on June 10, 2015 (Doc. 10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired June 29, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income is REVERSED because it is not supported by substantial evidence in the record.
This case is hereby REMANDED for further review and evaluation at the administrative level.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
