Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. FINLEY, 2:15-cr-148. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20150709e35 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On June 22, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Finley's guilty plea to a onecount Information charging her with conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371. Defendant, represented by counsel, waived her right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of
More

ORDER

On June 22, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Finley's guilty plea to a onecount Information charging her with conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Defendant, represented by counsel, waived her right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant's plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact.

Defendant was specifically informed of her right to contest the Report and Recommendation by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did not file any objections.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS Defendant's plea of guilty to the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer