HARRIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2:14-cv-1351. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150803832
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2015
Summary: MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . ORDER On July 13, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Griffin E. Harris's ("Plaintiff") Statement of Specific Errors in this Social Security case. ECF No. 20. Judge Deavers recommended that the Court reverse the Commissioner's non
Summary: MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . ORDER On July 13, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Griffin E. Harris's ("Plaintiff") Statement of Specific Errors in this Social Security case. ECF No. 20. Judge Deavers recommended that the Court reverse the Commissioner's non-..
More
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
ORDER
On July 13, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Griffin E. Harris's ("Plaintiff") Statement of Specific Errors in this Social Security case. ECF No. 20. Judge Deavers recommended that the Court reverse the Commissioner's non-disability finding and remand the case to the Commissioner and the Administrative LawJudge pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Id. at 13.
Judge Deavers notified the parties of their rightto file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Id. at 13-14. Judge Deavers also specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. at 14. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED, and the case is remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
