PRESTON v. COLVIN, 2:15-cv-135. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150825a58
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM , District Judge . This matter is before the court for consideration of the August 3, 2015, report and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). The magistrate judge recommended, in light of the joint stipulation of the parties (Doc. 14), that this case be remanded for further administrative proceedings. The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM , District Judge . This matter is before the court for consideration of the August 3, 2015, report and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). The magistrate judge recommended, in light of the joint stipulation of the parties (Doc. 14), that this case be remanded for further administrative proceedings. The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the r..
More
ORDER
JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge.
This matter is before the court for consideration of the August 3, 2015, report and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b). The magistrate judge recommended, in light of the joint stipulation of the parties (Doc. 14), that this case be remanded for further administrative proceedings.
The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the report and recommendation within fourteen days of the filing of the report "will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." Doc. 15, p. 1. The time for filing such objections has expired, and no objections have been filed.
In light of the joint stipulation of the parties, the court adopts and affirms the report and recommendation (Doc. 15). Pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is reversed, the non-disability finding of the Commissioner is vacated, and this action is hereby remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The clerk is directed to enter a final judgment in this case.
It is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
