Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF OHIO LABORERS' FRINGE BENEFIT PROGRAMS v. SJD CONSTRUCTION CO., 2:15-cv-2401. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20150918825 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST , District Judge . This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's motion to strike answer and to continue preliminary pretrial conference. (ECF No. 9.) The Court GRANTS the motion. It is well-settled that non-attorneys are not permitted to appear or maintain litigation on behalf of a corporation. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit 11 Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194 , 201-02 (1993) ("It has been the law for the better part of two cen
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's motion to strike answer and to continue preliminary pretrial conference. (ECF No. 9.) The Court GRANTS the motion.

It is well-settled that non-attorneys are not permitted to appear or maintain litigation on behalf of a corporation. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit 11 Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993) ("It has been the law for the better part of two centuries . . . that a corporation may appear in federal courts only through licensed counsel."); Doherty v. American Motors Corp., 728 F.2d 334, 340 (6th Cir. 1984) ("[A] corporation cannot appear in federal court except through an attorney.").

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) requires signature by an attorney or, if the party is not represented by an attorney, Rule 11(a) requires signature by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Because a corporation cannot appear in court except through an attorney, "[a] pleading by a corporation that is not signed by an attorney is treated as unsigned for Rule 11(a) purposes." White v. Smith, No. 2:09-cv-00574, 2010 WL 795967, at *1 (S.D. Ohio March 2, 2010) (citations omitted). "The court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the attorney's or party's attention." Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a).

Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to retain a trial attorney as provided in Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 83.4 WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. Failure to comply with this Order will result in Defendant's Answer being stricken pursuant to Rule 11(a), rendering Defendant in default.

The Court VACATES the preliminary pretrial conference scheduled for November 10, 2015. (ECF No. 8.) The Court will set a new date for the preliminary pretrial conference at a later time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer