BAYS v. WARDEN, OHIO STATE PENITENTIARY, 3:08-cv-076. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20151016d87
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 213), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondent's Moti
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 213), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondent's Motio..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 213), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 205) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
