Filed: Nov. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST , District Judge . This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated October 20, 2015. (ECF No. 19.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court deny Plaintiffs' motion to remand. (ECF No. 8.) The R&R advised the parties that, "[i]f any party seeks review by the District Judge of this [R&R], it may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the [R&R], s
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST , District Judge . This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated October 20, 2015. (ECF No. 19.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court deny Plaintiffs' motion to remand. (ECF No. 8.) The R&R advised the parties that, "[i]f any party seeks review by the District Judge of this [R&R], it may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the [R&R], sp..
More
ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated October 20, 2015. (ECF No. 19.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court deny Plaintiffs' motion to remand. (ECF No. 8.)
The R&R advised the parties that, "[i]f any party seeks review by the District Judge of this [R&R], it may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the [R&R], specifically designating this [R&R], and the part in question, as well as the basis for objection." (ECF No. 19, at PAGEID # 99 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)).) The R&R specifically advised the parties "that the failure to object to the [R&R] will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." (Id. (citing Pfahler v. Nat'l Latex Prod. Co., 517 F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007) and United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005)).)
The Court has reviewed the R&R. Noting that no objections have been filed, and that the time period for filing objections has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS AND AFFIRMS the R&R (ECF No. 19) and DENIES Plaintiffs' motion to remand (ECF No. 8).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
