WILT v. SYNGENTA AG, 3:15-cv-00451. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20160111b48
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . Upon considering Defendants' Motion To Stay Pending Transfer By Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation, and any responses thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. All proceedings in this case, including consideration of any motion to remand, are STAYED until thirty days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation determines whether to transfer this action to an MDL proceeding and completes any transfer of the action pursuant to
Summary: ORDER THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . Upon considering Defendants' Motion To Stay Pending Transfer By Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation, and any responses thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. All proceedings in this case, including consideration of any motion to remand, are STAYED until thirty days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation determines whether to transfer this action to an MDL proceeding and completes any transfer of the action pursuant to 2..
More
ORDER
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
Upon considering Defendants' Motion To Stay Pending Transfer By Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation, and any responses thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. All proceedings in this case, including consideration of any motion to remand, are STAYED until thirty days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation determines whether to transfer this action to an MDL proceeding and completes any transfer of the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See In re Syngenta MIR162 Corn Litig., MDL No. 2591.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
