ZAPATA v. BURKES, 2:15-cv-3076. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20160127945
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr. , Chief District Judge . On December 14, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the state law claims asserted in the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice unless and until the Ohio Court of Claims determines that the defendants are not entitled to civil immunity under O.R.C. 9.86. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequence
Summary: ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr. , Chief District Judge . On December 14, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the state law claims asserted in the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice unless and until the Ohio Court of Claims determines that the defendants are not entitled to civil immunity under O.R.C. 9.86. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences..
More
ORDER
EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr., Chief District Judge.
On December 14, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the state law claims asserted in the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice unless and until the Ohio Court of Claims determines that the defendants are not entitled to civil immunity under O.R.C. § 9.86. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.
The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice unless and until the Ohio Court of Claims determines that the defendants are not entitled to civil immunity under O.R.C. § 9.86.
Source: Leagle
