Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BYRGE EX REL. HOLBROOK v. DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC., 3:14cv60. (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20160202904 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2016
Summary: ENTRY OVERRULING CERTAIN MOTIONS IN LIMINE AS MOOT, GIVEN PLAINTIFFS' WARRANTY THAT NO EVIDENCE WILL BE OFFERED ON THE SUBJECT OF SAME; FURTHER PROCEDURES SET WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . Pursuant to a January 14, 2016, telephone conference had between Court and counsel, the following motions are deemed to be moot, given the Plaintiffs' warranty that no evidence will be offered on the subject of same, and, accordingly, are OVERRULED: Docs. #36, #37, #38, #40, #41, #42, #45, and #46. As
More

ENTRY OVERRULING CERTAIN MOTIONS IN LIMINE AS MOOT, GIVEN PLAINTIFFS' WARRANTY THAT NO EVIDENCE WILL BE OFFERED ON THE SUBJECT OF SAME; FURTHER PROCEDURES SET

Pursuant to a January 14, 2016, telephone conference had between Court and counsel, the following motions are deemed to be moot, given the Plaintiffs' warranty that no evidence will be offered on the subject of same, and, accordingly, are OVERRULED: Docs. #36, #37, #38, #40, #41, #42, #45, and #46. As to Motions in Limine filed at Doc. #39 and #43, Plaintiffs' counsel will have until the close of business on February 4, 2016, to determine whether said motions are moot or, in the alternative, whether Plaintiffs will contest them. If the former, counsel will so advise the Court. If the latter, said counsel will file a memorandum contra by the aforesaid February 4, 2016, with the moving Defendant having ten days following said filing to file whatever reply memorandum is deemed necessary.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer