WEEKLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2:14-cv-2051. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20160203e68
Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On January 13, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Kemp, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Jennifer Weekley's ("Plaintiff") Statement of Specific Errors in this Social Security case. ECF No. 20. Judge Kemp recommended that Plaintiffs Statement of Specific Errors be su
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On January 13, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Kemp, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Jennifer Weekley's ("Plaintiff") Statement of Specific Errors in this Social Security case. ECF No. 20. Judge Kemp recommended that Plaintiffs Statement of Specific Errors be sus..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
On January 13, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Kemp, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order 14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Jennifer Weekley's ("Plaintiff") Statement of Specific Errors in this Social Security case. ECF No. 20. Judge Kemp recommended that Plaintiffs Statement of Specific Errors be sustained and that this case be remanded to the Commissioner. Id. at 10.
Judge Kemp notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Id. at 11. Judge Kemp also specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to cfe novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. Plaintiffs Statement of Specific Errors is sustained, and this case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
