Bostic v. Colvin, 3:15-cv-109. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20160303c05
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2016
Summary: ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 13) TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 12); ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 12) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY DETERMINATION; AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This is an action under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying Plaintiff Fonda R. Bostic's application for Disability Insura
Summary: ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 13) TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 12); ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 12) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY DETERMINATION; AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This is an action under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying Plaintiff Fonda R. Bostic's application for Disability Insuran..
More
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 13) TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 12); ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 12) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY DETERMINATION; AND TERMINATING THIS CASE
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying Plaintiff Fonda R. Bostic's application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. On February 12, 2016, Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington entered a Report and Recommendations (Doc. 12), which recommended that the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision. On February 18, 2016, Plaintiff filed Objections (Doc. 13) to the Report and Recommendations. The Commissioner responded to the Objections on March 2, 2016. (Doc. 14.)
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 13) to the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 12) are not well taken and they are hereby OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 12) in their entirety and therefore AFFIRMS the Commissioner's non-disability decision. The Clerk is ORDERED to terminate this case on the Court's docket.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
