Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DAMERON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 3:15-cv-253. (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20160311828 Visitors: 34
Filed: Mar. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING THE JOINT, UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR REMAND (DOC. 9); (2) REVERSING THE ALJ'S NON-DISABILITY FINDING; (3) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS; (4) DIRECTING THE CLERK TO ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF; AND (5) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT'S DOCKET WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . The parties in this Social Security disability benefits appeal jointly move for an Or
More

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING THE JOINT, UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR REMAND (DOC. 9); (2) REVERSING THE ALJ'S NON-DISABILITY FINDING; (3) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS; (4) DIRECTING THE CLERK TO ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF; AND (5) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT'S DOCKET

The parties in this Social Security disability benefits appeal jointly move for an Order remanding this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and for the entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Doc. 9. The parties state that, on remand, the Administrative Law Judge will reconsider and reweigh all of the record's medical opinions in a manner consistent with the regulations and evidence. Id.

For good cause shown, and because the requirements of a Sentence Four remand have been satisfied, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) the parties' joint, unopposed motion for a Sentence Four remand (doc. 9) is GRANTED; (2) the ALJ's non-disability finding is REVERSED; (3) this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and (4) this case is TERMINATED upon the Court's docket. The Clerk is ORDERED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer