U.S. v. McGinnis, 3:16cr00019. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20160425501
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER WALTER HERBERT RICE , District Judge . This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 22, 2016 before Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, who thereafter issued a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. #8). Having conducted a full colloquy with Defendant Stewart McGinnis, the Magistrate Judge concluded that his plea of guilty is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that there is an adequate factual basis for a finding of guilty. The Court, noting that no Ob
Summary: ORDER WALTER HERBERT RICE , District Judge . This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 22, 2016 before Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, who thereafter issued a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. #8). Having conducted a full colloquy with Defendant Stewart McGinnis, the Magistrate Judge concluded that his plea of guilty is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that there is an adequate factual basis for a finding of guilty. The Court, noting that no Obj..
More
ORDER
WALTER HERBERT RICE, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 22, 2016 before Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, who thereafter issued a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. #8). Having conducted a full colloquy with Defendant Stewart McGinnis, the Magistrate Judge concluded that his plea of guilty is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that there is an adequate factual basis for a finding of guilty.
The Court, noting that no Objections to the Report and Recommendations have been filed and that the time for filing Objections has expired, hereby ADOPTS in full said Report and Recommendations.
Therefore, based on the aforesaid, and this Court's de novo review of the record and the findings by the United States Magistrate Judge, this Court adopts the findings and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and finds that Defendant Stewart McGinnis' guilty plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Final acceptance of Defendant's guilty plea is deferred pending review of the pre-sentence investigation report.
Source: Leagle
