GRIESINGER v. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI, 1:13-cv-808. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20161114b60
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . The Court, having been advised that after settlement negotiations that the parties have reached a settlement in the above-styled case. It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. It is provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a more particularized Order of Dismissal within t
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . The Court, having been advised that after settlement negotiations that the parties have reached a settlement in the above-styled case. It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. It is provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a more particularized Order of Dismissal within th..
More
ORDER
KAREN L. LITKOVITZ, Magistrate Judge.
The Court, having been advised that after settlement negotiations that the parties have reached a settlement in the above-styled case.
It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. It is provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a more particularized Order of Dismissal within this same time frame, should they so desire.
The Court retains jurisdiction over the settlement contract for the purpose of its enforcement.
Source: Leagle
