KIMBERLY A. JOLSON, Magistrate Judge.
This is an action for unpaid fringe benefit contributions, liquidated damages, and interest allegedly owed certain employee benefits plans pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. Plaintiffs, the trustees of four trust funds, assert claims under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Defendants CJ&L Construction, Inc. and James Kossen were served with a summons and a copy of the complaint on January 2, 2017 (Docs. 3-4), but have failed to plead or otherwise defend this action. Plaintiffs applied to the Clerk for entry of default (Doc. 5), and the Clerk entered default pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 55(a) on January 27, 2017 (Doc. 7). This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment, seeking default judgment against Defendant CJ&L Construction, Inc. (Doc. 6). Plaintiffs also request that the claims against Defendant James Kossen be dismissed. (Id. at 1).
Plaintiffs have established that Defendant CJ&L Construction, Inc. entered into an agreement with a local union affiliated with the Laborers' District Council of Ohio, AFL-CIO, by which it agreed to pay contributions to the funds, by the 15
Plaintiffs seek an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $1,960.00, for 7.00 hours billed at the rate of $280.00 per hour. (Doc. 6-3, PAGEID #: 33). Plaintiffs have provided evidentiary support that the number of hours billed and the hourly rates charged are reasonable. (Id.).
Plaintiffs are therefore entitled to judgment in the amount of $12,836.97 in unpaid fringe benefit contributions, liquidated damages, and prejudgment interest, and an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $1,960.00.
Accordingly, it is
If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers, Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
IT IS SO ORDERED.