Yakhmi v. Internal Revenue Service, 2:16-cv-00986. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20170301f24
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY , District Judge . The complaint in this action was filed on October 14, 2016, but there is no record that service has been made on the defendants. On February 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge Kemp ordered Plaintiff to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) and why an extension of time to effect service should be allowed. Plaintiff failed to respond to the order. Therefore, under Federal Rule of
Summary: ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY , District Judge . The complaint in this action was filed on October 14, 2016, but there is no record that service has been made on the defendants. On February 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge Kemp ordered Plaintiff to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) and why an extension of time to effect service should be allowed. Plaintiff failed to respond to the order. Therefore, under Federal Rule of C..
More
ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
The complaint in this action was filed on October 14, 2016, but there is no record that service has been made on the defendants. On February 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge Kemp ordered Plaintiff to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) and why an extension of time to effect service should be allowed. Plaintiff failed to respond to the order. Therefore, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
