THOMAS v. COMMUNITY PROPERTIES OF OHIO MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, 2:15-cv-2960. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20170314608
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr. , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court for consideration of all Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 19), which the Defendants filed on January 3, 2017. On January 18, 2017, Plaintiff's attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and requested an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' motion. For good cause shown, Magistrate Judge Deavers granted the motion to withdraw as counsel and ordered that Plain
Summary: ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr. , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court for consideration of all Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 19), which the Defendants filed on January 3, 2017. On January 18, 2017, Plaintiff's attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and requested an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' motion. For good cause shown, Magistrate Judge Deavers granted the motion to withdraw as counsel and ordered that Plaint..
More
ORDER
EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr., Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of all Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 19), which the Defendants filed on January 3, 2017. On January 18, 2017, Plaintiff's attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and requested an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' motion. For good cause shown, Magistrate Judge Deavers granted the motion to withdraw as counsel and ordered that Plaintiff file any response to Defendants' motion by February 23, 2017. The Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff of his responsibility to follow the Rules of Civil Procedure even if he was proceeding without the assistance of counsel. The Plaintiff has failed to respond to Defendants' Motion (ECF No. 19), which is therefore GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of the Defendants. This case is hereby DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
