BACK v. TEKNOL, INC., 3:16-cv-00323. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20170711c29
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL TERMINATION ENTRY THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL TERMINATION ENTRY THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v...
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL TERMINATION ENTRY
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.
Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.
The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
