Parrish v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution, 3:16-cv-486. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20171206965
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: RECOMMITAL ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 42) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 41). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplem
Summary: RECOMMITAL ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 42) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 41). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a suppleme..
More
RECOMMITAL ORDER
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 42) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 41).
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental opinion analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis.
Source: Leagle
