Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:17-cv-148. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20171213g86
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2017
Summary: ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA") (DOC. 12); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $2,200.00 IN EAJA FEES AND COSTS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412, in the amount of $2,200.00. Doc
Summary: ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA") (DOC. 12); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $2,200.00 IN EAJA FEES AND COSTS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412, in the amount of $2,200.00. Doc...
More
ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA") (DOC. 12); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $2,200.00 IN EAJA FEES AND COSTS
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $2,200.00. Doc. 12. Based upon the parties' stipulation in which they present no dispute that all requirements are met for the reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties' joint stipulation (doc. 12); and (2) GRANTS Plaintiff EAJA fees and costs in the amount of $2,200.00. As no further matters remain pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court's docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
