Dayton v. Purdue Pharma LP, 3:17-cv-00229-TMR. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20171214g28
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MANUFACTURER DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACTION BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . For good cause shown, Manufacturer Defendants' Unopposed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Action by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is GRANTED. All proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed pending a final decision on the motion to transfer pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidi
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MANUFACTURER DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACTION BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . For good cause shown, Manufacturer Defendants' Unopposed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Action by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is GRANTED. All proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed pending a final decision on the motion to transfer pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidis..
More
ORDER GRANTING MANUFACTURER DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACTION BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
For good cause shown, Manufacturer Defendants' Unopposed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Action by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is GRANTED. All proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed pending a final decision on the motion to transfer pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
