USA v. Drone, 2:15-CR-00192(1). (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180131f53
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On January 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (ECF No. 102) be dismissed. (ECF No. 118). Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 118) is hereby ADOPTED a
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On January 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (ECF No. 102) be dismissed. (ECF No. 118). Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 118) is hereby ADOPTED an..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
On January 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 102) be dismissed. (ECF No. 118). Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 118) is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 102) is hereby DISMISSED.
Petitioner has failed to exercise his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
