Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Miller v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 3:17-cv-55. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20180220c09 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 26) WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #26), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) The Re
More

ORDER AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 26)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #26), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #26) is ADOPTED in full; (2) Defendants' partial motion to dismiss (doc. #5) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; (3) Counts Three, Nine, and Ten of Plaintiffs' complaint are hereby DISMISSED; and (4) Count One of Plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED to the limited extent Plaintiffs contend that Defendants' creation of an escrow account violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"), 12 U.S.C. § 2605.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer