Clark v. Gotwals, 1:16-cv-1157. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180406828
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . The Court has been advised that this case has been settled. It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforc
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . The Court has been advised that this case has been settled. It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce..
More
ORDER
KAREN L. LITKOVITZ, Magistrate Judge.
The Court has been advised that this case has been settled.
It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement.
The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
