Carney v. Smith, 1:17cv428. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180406830
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to notification that this matter has been settled between the parties: It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a more particularized Order of Dismissal within this same time frame, should they so desire. The Court retains jurisdiction over the sett
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to notification that this matter has been settled between the parties: It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a more particularized Order of Dismissal within this same time frame, should they so desire. The Court retains jurisdiction over the settl..
More
ORDER
KAREN L. LITKOVITZ, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to notification that this matter has been settled between the parties:
It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a more particularized Order of Dismissal within this same time frame, should they so desire.
The Court retains jurisdiction over the settlement agreement for the purpose of its enforcement.
Source: Leagle
