Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. Synder, 2:17-cv-349. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20180412c96 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY A. JOLSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Third-Party Defendant Jody Babcock's second unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move or Plead in Response to Third-Party Plaintiff Ohio Valley Corporate Housing, LLC's Third-Party Complaint. (Doc. 83). Although styled as an extension, the relief Ms. Babcock is actually seeking is a stay of her responsive pleading deadline. ( Id. ). Counsel for Ms. Babcock has suggested that when filing the Rule 26(f) Rep
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Third-Party Defendant Jody Babcock's second unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move or Plead in Response to Third-Party Plaintiff Ohio Valley Corporate Housing, LLC's Third-Party Complaint. (Doc. 83). Although styled as an extension, the relief Ms. Babcock is actually seeking is a stay of her responsive pleading deadline. (Id.). Counsel for Ms. Babcock has suggested that when filing the Rule 26(f) Report for the upcoming preliminary pretrial conference, both Ms. Babcock and Halliburton—whose responsive pleading deadline was stayed by the Court on December 1, 2017 (Doc. 67)—will jointly propose a responsive pleading deadline for both parties. For good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. Consequently, Third-Party Defendant Jody Babcock's responsive pleading is STAYED, but Ms. Babcock and Halliburton are DIRECTED to propose a responsive pleading deadline in their upcoming Rule 26(f) Report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer