Griffith v. Tractor Supply Company, 2:17-cv-763. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180427h16
Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On April 4, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice against Defendant John Doe for failure to timely effect service of process pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ( See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 17). The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On April 4, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice against Defendant John Doe for failure to timely effect service of process pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ( See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 17). The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences o..
More
ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
On April 4, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice against Defendant John Doe for failure to timely effect service of process pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 17). The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process against Defendant John Doe only.
The Clerk shall remove Document 17 from the Court's pending motions list.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle