Cooper v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:17-cv-100. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180706a79
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION (DOC. 17) FOR AN AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA"); AND (2) AWARDING EAJA ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,000.00 MICHAEL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney's fees, costs, and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA")
Summary: ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION (DOC. 17) FOR AN AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA"); AND (2) AWARDING EAJA ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,000.00 MICHAEL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney's fees, costs, and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"),..
More
ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION (DOC. 17) FOR AN AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA"); AND (2) AWARDING EAJA ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,000.00
MICHAEL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney's fees, costs, and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the total amount of $4,000.00. Doc. 17. There being no dispute that all requirements are met for the reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties' joint stipulation for an EAJA award (doc. 17); and (2) AWARDS Plaintiff EAJA fees, costs, and expenses in the amount of $4,000.00. As no further matters remain pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court's docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
