McDougald v. Erdos, 1:17cv95. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180913j38
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on August 9, 2018 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on August 9, 2018 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc...
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on August 9, 2018 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 40), and the defendants filed a response to the plaintiff's objections (Doc. 41).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. All remaining pending motions (Doc. 38) are DENIED as MOOT.
This case is hereby TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
