Boles v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority, 3:18-cv-236. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20181002n66
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 12), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired on September 19, 2018, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that the
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 12), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired on September 19, 2018, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that the ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 12), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired on September 19, 2018, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability and the Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.
Source: Leagle
