Noticxe, Inc. v. Oakley, Inc., 3:18-cv-00056. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190103d48
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 31, 2018
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #22), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1.
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #22), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. T..
More
DECISION AND ENTRY
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #22), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
It is therefore ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendations filed on December 13, 2018 (Doc. #22) is ADOPTED in full; and
2. Plaintiff Noticxe, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Oakley, Inc.'s Counterclaims for Conversion and Replevin (Doc. #18) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
