Bullocks v. Keating, 1:17cv440. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190110d61
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 6, 2018 (Doc. 41). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 6, 2018 (Doc. 41). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate ..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 6, 2018 (Doc. 41).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R (Doc. 41) have been filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 41) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Doc. 19) and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 30) are GRANTED and Defendant Fri (a/k/a "Freye") is dismissed including Plaintiff's "failure to protect" claim. Lastly, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Amendment (Docs. 20, 23) are DENIED. This matter is closed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
