Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. v. Crown Packaging Technology, Inc., 3:12-cv-0033 (WHR). (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190111811
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . Upon the motion of Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. and Rexam Beverage Can Company, for good cause shown and pursuant to the Protective Order in this case (Dkt. 15) and Local Rule 5.2.1(a), Ball and Rexam are hereby granted leave to file under seal unredacted versions of their Reply Memoranda in support of their Motions for Summary Judgment on Infringement (Doc. 84) and Validity (Doc. 85) and of exhibits to such Reply Memoranda that contain Protect
Summary: ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . Upon the motion of Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. and Rexam Beverage Can Company, for good cause shown and pursuant to the Protective Order in this case (Dkt. 15) and Local Rule 5.2.1(a), Ball and Rexam are hereby granted leave to file under seal unredacted versions of their Reply Memoranda in support of their Motions for Summary Judgment on Infringement (Doc. 84) and Validity (Doc. 85) and of exhibits to such Reply Memoranda that contain Protecte..
More
ORDER
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
Upon the motion of Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. and Rexam Beverage Can Company, for good cause shown and pursuant to the Protective Order in this case (Dkt. 15) and Local Rule 5.2.1(a), Ball and Rexam are hereby granted leave to file under seal unredacted versions of their Reply Memoranda in support of their Motions for Summary Judgment on Infringement (Doc. 84) and Validity (Doc. 85) and of exhibits to such Reply Memoranda that contain Protected Materials.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
