Dobbins v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:18-cv-725. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190403g99
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On March 6, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Vascura issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 13, concerning the denial of Tina M. Dobbins' ("Plaintiff) application for Social Security disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The R&R recommended the Court reverse the Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner") non-disability finding and remand this case to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Jud
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On March 6, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Vascura issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 13, concerning the denial of Tina M. Dobbins' ("Plaintiff) application for Social Security disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The R&R recommended the Court reverse the Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner") non-disability finding and remand this case to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judg..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
On March 6, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Vascura issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 13, concerning the denial of Tina M. Dobbins' ("Plaintiff) application for Social Security disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The R&R recommended the Court reverse the Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner") non-disability finding and remand this case to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge Under Sentence Four of § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the R&R. R&R 1, ECF No. 13.
The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Id. at 15. The R&R further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the R&R.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
