Harriman v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-1170. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190410795
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . This case is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. 10). The parties jointly move this Court to remand this case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1 . Upon remand, the Appeals
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . This case is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. 10). The parties jointly move this Court to remand this case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1 . Upon remand, the Appeals ..
More
ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. 10). The parties jointly move this Court to remand this case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure1.
Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge's decision. The Commissioner will conduct further proceedings and develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, hold a new hearing, and then issue a new decision.
Accordingly, pursuant to the Joint Motion to Remand, this action is remanded for further proceedings. The Clerk of this Court shall terminate Document 10, enter final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Pursuant to Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302-03 (1993), a Sentence Four remand is a final judgment, and the court should direct the clerk to enter judgment on a separate document, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, remanding the case to the Social Security Administration.
Source: Leagle
