U.S. v. Preston, 3:18cr185. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190521749
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 10, 2019
Latest Update: May 10, 2019
Summary: ENTRY SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE (DOC. #22) WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . At the conclusion of the oral and evidentiary hearing, held on the Defendant's Motion seeking an order of the Court suppressing evidence (Doc. #22) on May 1, 2019, the following briefing schedule was discussed and agreed upon: within 21 days of the transcript of the aforesaid oral and evidentiary hearing being filed, Defendant is to file his post-hearing memorandum, to be
Summary: ENTRY SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE (DOC. #22) WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . At the conclusion of the oral and evidentiary hearing, held on the Defendant's Motion seeking an order of the Court suppressing evidence (Doc. #22) on May 1, 2019, the following briefing schedule was discussed and agreed upon: within 21 days of the transcript of the aforesaid oral and evidentiary hearing being filed, Defendant is to file his post-hearing memorandum, to be f..
More
ENTRY SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE (DOC. #22)
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
At the conclusion of the oral and evidentiary hearing, held on the Defendant's Motion seeking an order of the Court suppressing evidence (Doc. #22) on May 1, 2019, the following briefing schedule was discussed and agreed upon: within 21 days of the transcript of the aforesaid oral and evidentiary hearing being filed, Defendant is to file his post-hearing memorandum, to be followed within 21 days thereafter by the Government's memorandum in opposition to said motion. The moving Defendant will then have 14 days following the government's submission to file whatever reply memorandum is deemed necessary.
Source: Leagle
