Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sicurella v. Union Township Police Dept., 1:19-cv-86. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20190607a57 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 09, 2019
Latest Update: May 09, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STEPHANIE K. BOWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On January 31, 2019, while incarcerated in the Clermont County Jail, Plaintiff initiated this pro se civil rights case against the Union Township Police Department, Officer Michael Ventre, and Sgt. Wagner. (Docs. 1, 6). After this Court set a calendar order, the parties filed several motions, which remain pending. (Docs. 10, 11, 14, 17). However, on May 6, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to voluntarily dismiss all cl
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On January 31, 2019, while incarcerated in the Clermont County Jail, Plaintiff initiated this pro se civil rights case against the Union Township Police Department, Officer Michael Ventre, and Sgt. Wagner. (Docs. 1, 6).

After this Court set a calendar order, the parties filed several motions, which remain pending. (Docs. 10, 11, 14, 17). However, on May 6, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to voluntarily dismiss all claims. (Doc. 18). Defendants have filed a Notice stating they have no objection to Plaintiff's motion to dismiss without prejudice. (Doc. 19). Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Plaintiff's motion to dismiss (Doc. 18) be GRANTED, that all pending motions (Docs. 10, 11, 14, 17) be DENIED AS MOOT, and that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice and closed.

NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to this Report and Recommendation ("R&R") within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the filing date of this R&R. That period may be extended further by the Court on timely motion by either side for an extension of time. All objections shall specify the portion(s) of the R&R objected to, and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. A party shall respond to an opponent's objections within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after being served with a copy of those objections. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer