Dalmida v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institute, 1:17cv488. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190613750
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on April 11, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22). Subsequently, the petitioner filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on April 11, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22). Subsequently, the petitioner filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on April 11, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22). Subsequently, the petitioner filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) and the respondent filed a response to the objections (Doc. 26).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, petitioner's petition is DISMISSED with prejudice (Doc. 1). Petitioner is also DENIED a certificate of appealability. This Court CERTIFIES to the Sixth Circuit that an appeal would be objectively frivolous, therefore, petitioner is not permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
