Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:18-cv-609. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190711c96
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's April 8, 2019, Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 21). The Magistrate recommended that the Commissioner of Social Security's non-disability finding be reversed and remanded to the Administrative Law Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by April 22, 2019. No objections were filed. The parties' failure to object results in a waiver of the right to have the district
Summary: ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's April 8, 2019, Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 21). The Magistrate recommended that the Commissioner of Social Security's non-disability finding be reversed and remanded to the Administrative Law Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by April 22, 2019. No objections were filed. The parties' failure to object results in a waiver of the right to have the district j..
More
ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's April 8, 2019, Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 21). The Magistrate recommended that the Commissioner of Social Security's non-disability finding be reversed and remanded to the Administrative Law Judge.
Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by April 22, 2019. No objections were filed. The parties' failure to object results in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
This Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation based on an independent consideration of the analysis therein. The Commissioner of Social Security's non-disability finding is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the administrative law judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
