Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tucker v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company, 3:18-cv-402. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20190725d07 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW (DOC. 11) MICHAEL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw as the attorney of record for Plaintiff. Doc. 11. In accordance with S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 83.4(c)(2), counsel served a copy of the motion on Plaintiff. Because the Court "will not ordinarily grant a motion for leave to withdraw until the client has been given an opportunity to respond to the motion[,]
More

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW (DOC. 11)

This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw as the attorney of record for Plaintiff. Doc. 11. In accordance with S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 83.4(c)(2), counsel served a copy of the motion on Plaintiff. Because the Court "will not ordinarily grant a motion for leave to withdraw until the client has been given an opportunity to respond to the motion[,]" S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 83.4(c)(4), the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file any response to counsel's motion to withdraw on or before August 14, 2019. Should Plaintiff not respond, the Court may grant such motion as unopposed. Plaintiff's counsel of record is ORDERED to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff forthwith via mail and, if possible, email.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer