Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gattermeyer v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:17cv286. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20190805b33 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") filed by the Magistrate Judge on July 17, 2019 (Doc. 21). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Ju
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") filed by the Magistrate Judge on July 17, 2019 (Doc. 21).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R (Doc. 21) have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 21) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Counsel should be awarded a gross fee of $7,365.00 under 42 U.S.C. §406(b). Applying an offset of $3,000—the amount of the EAJA fee previously awarded—yields a net fee totaling $4,365.00, which should be paid to counsel out of Plaintiffs past-due benefits award.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer