Mabry-Schlicher v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:19-CV-10. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190806d69
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA") (DOC. 19); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $4,260.00 IN EAJA FEES MICHAEL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412, in the amount of $4,260.00.
Summary: ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA") (DOC. 19); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $4,260.00 IN EAJA FEES MICHAEL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412, in the amount of $4,260.00. ..
More
ORDER: (1) APPROVING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA") (DOC. 19); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $4,260.00 IN EAJA FEES
MICHAEL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $4,260.00. Doc. 19. Based upon the parties' stipulation in which they present no dispute that all requirements are met for the reasonable award of EAJA fees, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties' joint stipulation (doc. 19); and (2) GRANTS Plaintiff EAJA fees in the amount of $4,260.00. As no further matters remain pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court's docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
