Al'Shahid v. Mohr, 2:18-cv-033. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190808d98
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On June 21, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 16. R&R, ECF No. 24. The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Id. at 14-15. The R&R further advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would resul
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On June 21, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 16. R&R, ECF No. 24. The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Id. at 14-15. The R&R further advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
On June 21, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 16. R&R, ECF No. 24. The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Id. at 14-15. The R&R further advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to any compensatory claims Plaintiff seeks against Defendants in their official capacity and DENIED with respect to habeas corpus, failure to state a claim under § 1983, and standing. The clerk is DIRECTED to terminate ECF No. 24.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
