Davis v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 3:18-cv-253. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190829b75
Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2019
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #16), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, this Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #16), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, this Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report ..
More
DECISION AND ENTRY
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #16), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, this Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendations filed on August 9, 2019 (Doc. #16) is ADOPTED in full;
2. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is REVERSED;
3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for payment of benefits consistent with this Decision and the Report and Recommendations; and
4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
