Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cooper v. Saul, 3:17-cv-374. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20191118c59 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2019
Summary: ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF 17), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, (ECF 15), REMANDING TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND TERMINATING CASE. THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . Plaintiff Cathy Cooper filed an action in this Court seeking judicial review of a prior decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administ
More

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF 17), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, (ECF 15), REMANDING TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND TERMINATING CASE.

Plaintiff Cathy Cooper filed an action in this Court seeking judicial review of a prior decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff's application for Social Security benefits. United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington filed a Report and Recommendations (ECF 15) recommending that the Commissioner's decision be vacated and remanded to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration. The Commissioner has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendations. (ECF 17).

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is correct. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, (ECF 15), DENIES the Objection of the Commissioner, (ECF 17); REMANDS this case to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Report and Recommendations,1 and TERMINATES this case on the dockets of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Dayton.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. No finding is hereby made as to whether Plaintiff was under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer