Filed: Dec. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO MANUALLY FILE EXHIBITS (DOCS. 166); (2) GRANTING PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW HIS MOTION FOR RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS (DOC. 168); (3) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS (DOC. 167); (4) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 168); AND (5) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A ME
Summary: ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO MANUALLY FILE EXHIBITS (DOCS. 166); (2) GRANTING PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW HIS MOTION FOR RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS (DOC. 168); (3) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS (DOC. 167); (4) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 168); AND (5) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MEM..
More
ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO MANUALLY FILE EXHIBITS (DOCS. 166); (2) GRANTING PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW HIS MOTION FOR RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS (DOC. 168); (3) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS (DOC. 167); (4) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 168); AND (5) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION THAT EXCEEDS THE PAGE LIMITATION (DOC. 168)
MICHAEL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
This civil case is before the Court is before the Court on three separate motions, which the undersigned will address in turn. Docs. 166, 167, 168.
First, Defendants move for leave to file certain exhibits manually because of issues encountered by counsel when attempting to electronically file those exhibits in support of their second motion for summary judgment. Doc. 166. For good cause shown, Defendants' motion (doc. 166) is GRANTED.
Second, pro se Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to preclude Defendants from moving for summary judgment on the remaining claims in this case because he had not received a service copy of their second motion for summary judgment by the original filing deadline set by the Court. Doc. 167. Subsequently, Plaintiff received a service copy of Defendants' motion, as well as service copies of the Court's order granting Defendants an extension of time to so file. Doc. 168. As a result, Plaintiff moves to withdraw his prior motion seeking relief against Defendants. Doc.168. In addition, moves for an extension of time to file a memorandum in opposition and for leave to exceed the 20-page limitation set forth in the Court's Local Rules. Doc. 168.
For good cause shown, Plaintiffs' previous motion seeking relief against Defendants (doc. 167) is deemed WITHDRAWN and, thus, DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time and for leave to exceed the page limitation (doc. 168) are GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his memorandum in opposition to Defendants' second motion for summary judgment on or before January 21, 2020. In addition, Plaintiff's memorandum in opposition may reasonably exceed 20 pages, but shall not exceed 50 pages in length.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
